Thoughts on design, technology, and the things in between.
Some thoughts should not disappear
This journal is a place to give ideas a little more room. What you find here is not just commentary, but perspective. Ongoing reflections shaped by practice, observation, and a bit of curiosity.
↓ Highlights

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
Lessons on Being a Designer – that Nobody Talks About
Twenty years in design, and the lessons that actually stuck have nothing to do with software or trends. Nobody tells you that talent is mostly reps. That taste is a skill you have to build on purpose, not something you're born with. That the best ideas rarely come from another portfolio site, they come from paying attention to your surrounding.
LinkedIn Article
Craft & Creative Culture
Craft in the Age of AI
Access gives you output. Craft gives you work. Everyone has the same AI tools right now. Almost nobody is using them the same way, and that gap is where the real difference sits. Four pieces landed in my feed this week, all circling the same question from different angles: what happens to craft once execution gets automated.


LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
Infinite Options. Zero Filter.
AI creates options. Strategy decides what becomes real. Generation stopped being the bottleneck a while ago. Nobody rebuilt judgment to match. New article is about that gap — what lets brand design drift into the wrong direction, why "possible" isn't a strategy, and the three questions I use to filter instead of just generating more.
↓Articles

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
More Use, More Anger: The Mood on AI Is Turning
More use. More anger. The mood on AI is turning, and it's not because the technology got worse. It comes down to what happens once the demo ends and a business has to make the thing actually hold. I wrote about where the anger is coming from, and what it's revealing about companies who thought a tool would fix a structural problem it never touched.

LinkedIn Article
Industry & Change
The real cost of replacing humans with AI
Klarna fired 700 people to prove AI could do the job. A year later they were hiring for the same roles. That's the part every "replace to save money" pitch skips. It counts the salary you remove. It never counts what you have to add back in: oversight, review cycles, the person catching the edge case nobody wrote a policy for.

LinkedIn Article
Craft & Creative Culture
Taste Is Not Enough – The Visual Designer in 2026
AI can now read a layout, describe the hierarchy, generate something passable in seconds. That doesn't kill visual design. It kills the cover that vague craft used to hide behind. If you can't explain why something works, a model can fake your output without your reasoning attached. The real test was never whether a machine can parse your work. It's whether a human still wants it.

LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
Built for AI. Broken by Drift.
You built the foundation right. Clean tokens. Precise documentation. Brand logic translated into rules an AI can actually use. And the output still drifted. Not obviously. Not all at once. Just close enough to pass review, repeated enough times to quietly shift everything. That's the failure mode nobody talks about. And it has nothing to do with your foundation.

LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
Adjusting on the Go – Digital Production Reality These Days
Five teams. One product. Five different directions, and nobody planned it that way. That's digital production right now. Design first, code second stopped being the rule a while ago, it just took longer for anyone to say it out loud. Teams prototype in code before design opens a file.

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
Keep up with tech – The Relevance Window Is Shrinking Faster Than We Are
The time it takes to study a new technology now exceeds that technology's relevance window. That's not a motivation problem. That's just the math. New article on why chasing the pace is the wrong game, and what to do instead.

LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
Designer's Tool Stack – a staffing exercise, not a shopping list
Design Track and Code Track on my team never share a single tool. I stopped starting with tools and started with the workflow instead. Drew it out, broke it into the activities it's actually made of, then assigned one tool to each. Not the other way round. Worth running this exercise on your own workflow before the next tool renewal lands on your desk!

LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
From Human-Readable to Machine-Parseable
Bold but approachable. Premium, but not distant. Human-first." Beautiful. Completely useless for execution at scale. There's a translation layer missing between brand strategy and the systems that execute it. New article on what that looks like — and why nobody owns it yet.

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
Designed by Humans. For Humans.
Most agencies call it transformation. Faster pipelines, AI-powered workflows, new platform, big stage moment. Under the hood, it's the same business logic at higher speed. The question nobody asks first: how is human behavior actually changing, and what does that mean for what we build? Knowing what not to build is a human judgment call. So is knowing what your customers actually need before you reach for the tool.

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
Human-Led Design, Systemised for AI.
Most AI workflow conversations start with the toolchain. Which tool, which pipeline, which model. Wrong starting point! The bet worth making: human-led design, systemised for AI. Taste embedded in the system before generation begins. Not as a principle – as a production architecture.

LinkedIn Article
AI & Future of Work
Before the System, Fix the Brand
A design system won't fix an unclear brand. It will scale the confusion faster. Before tokens, before components, before governance, there's a question that has to be answered: what does this brand actually stand for? If nobody in the room can answer that clearly, execution is the wrong next step.

LinkedIn Article
Leadership & Experience
One Step Ahead. One Layer Behind. The UX knowledge gap.
UX has always encoded knowledge for humans. Designers can read between the lines. Agents can't do that. They only know what you've codified. And most design systems, brand assets, and product documentation were never built to be codified. They were built to be read. That's the gap.
↓ Archive
AI & Future of Work
Design Systems
Design Thinking
Industry & Change
Craft & Creative Culture
Leadership & Experience
Same journal, shorter scroll
Everything here also lives on LinkedIn's articles section – skip the site, get the list, read straight there.
Who's behind this
Background, focus, how the work actually gets made – all on the info page.
Micha Brandt
Design Leader • Product Designer • Systems Architect
B ⎯ ©’26
©2026. All rights reserved.


Adjusting on the Go – Digital Production Reality These Days